Q1. Why was the Doctrine of Lapse so deeply resented among Indian rulers?
- (a) It required rulers to convert to Christianity
- (b) It forced Indian states to abolish zamindari
- (c) It denied adopted heirs the right to succeed, undermining traditional succession
- (d) It imposed direct military rule on all states
Answer & solution
Answer: (c) It denied adopted heirs the right to succeed, undermining traditional succession
Under the Doctrine of Lapse, a dependent state whose ruler died without a natural male heir passed to the Company.
Adoption had always been a lawful way of securing an heir in Hindu custom, so rulers saw the doctrine as an attack on their very right to a successor.
Revision note — The Doctrine of Lapse
• Applied vigorously by Lord Dalhousie, Governor-General 1848–56; adoption needed the Company's sanction, which was refused to dependent states.
• States annexed under it: Satara (1848), Jaitpur and Sambalpur (1849), Udaipur (1852), Jhansi (1853) and Nagpur (1854).
• Jhansi was taken when Raja Gangadhar Rao's adopted son Damodar Rao was not recognised — the grievance that brought Rani Lakshmibai into the Revolt of 1857.
• Awadh (1856) was annexed on the plea of misgovernment, not lapse; Nana Saheb lost his pension because adoption was not recognised for the Peshwa's line.
• Dalhousie's other annexation, Punjab (1849), came by conquest after the Second Anglo-Sikh War; Lower Burma (Pegu) was annexed in 1852.
• The doctrine was formally abandoned in the Queen's Proclamation of 1858, which promised to respect the rights of Indian princes, including adoption.
Do not mix these up
• Subsidiary Alliance vs Doctrine of Lapse — the Alliance (Wellesley, 1798) took away a state's army and foreign policy;
the Doctrine (Dalhousie) took away the state itself when the ruler had no natural heir.
• Jhansi vs Awadh — Jhansi went by lapse (no natural heir); Awadh went by the charge of misgovernment.
Also asked from this topic: the Governor-General who devised the Doctrine of Lapse (Lord Dalhousie); the first state annexed under it (Satara, 1848).